Legal Opinion
In re Tenney
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 23, 1958No. 6327PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, Chief Judge
This is an appeal from a decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, rejecting claims 3 through 12,14 through 18, 21 and 22, all the claims remaining in appellants’ application No. 111,308, filed August 19, 1949, for “Machine for Producing Dispersions of Liquids in Air or Other Gases for the Production of Fogs,” as unpatentable over the prior art.
The alleged invention, as may be seen from its title, relates to fog producing apparatus, the essential element of said apparatus being a “pulse jet engine.” As will be hereinafter seen, it is not necessary to set forth the claims on appeal nor…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- The Garrett Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- In re WyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Philips Electronic and Pharmaceutical Industries Corp. v. Thermal and Electronics Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Maurice A. Garbell, Inc. v. Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1973
- In re BayerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.