Legal Opinion

Jones v. Jones

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1994No. 24876PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Kimberly Ann Porter (Porter) and respondent Michael S. Jones (Jones) have joint legal custody of their two sons; however, Porter is the primary physical custodian, while Jones has weekly visitation. Porter wishes to move to Chico, California, with the two boys. Pursuant to NRS 125A.350, Nevada’s “anti-removal” statute, Porter sought permission from Jones to move the boys out of the state. When Jones denied her request, Porter petitioned the district court for removal, and was again denied. Porter appeals. For the following reasons, we reverse the order of the district court…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Auge v. AugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Gruber v. GruberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Holder v. PolanskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. Schwartz v. SchwartzNevada Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. Farnsworth v. FarnsworthNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Trent v. TrentNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  3. McGuinness v. McGuinnessNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Flynn v. FlynnNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Gandee v. GandeeNevada Supreme Court · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API