Legal Opinion
Trent v. Trent
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1995No. 24741PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant Christi Trent (Christi) and respondent Kenneth Trent (Kenneth) are divorced. They have joint legal custody of their son Corey, with Christi having primary physical custody. Christi wishes to marry a man from Dover, Ohio, and move to Dover with Corey. Pursuant to NRS 125A.350, Christi sought permission from Kenneth to move with Corey. When Kenneth denied her request, Christi petitioned the district court for removal. The district court denied her petition, finding that Corey would lose a great deal if he moved to Dover. For the following reasons, we reverse the order of the…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Auge v. AugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- D'Onofrio v. D'OnofrioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Holder v. PolanskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Schwartz v. SchwartzNevada Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- Stout v. StoutNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Ireland v. IrelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- McGuinness v. McGuinnessNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Flynn v. FlynnNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Gandee v. GandeeNevada Supreme Court · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.