Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Flynn

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2004No. 41543PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In June 2003, the district court denied appellant Terri Flynn’s motion to relocate with the parties’ eleven-year-old child to California and also denied the change of custody motion brought by respondent Tim Flynn. Although Tim and Terri have joint legal custody of their minor child, Terri has primary physical custody. She brought the relocation motion so that she could move to California for a two-year period to obtain an associate’s degree in theology. Terri had no other purpose for the move.

Finding that the move would not serve the minor child’s best interest, the district court…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. SchwartzNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Culbertson v. CulbertsonNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Jones v. JonesNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Trent v. TrentNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  5. McGuinness v. McGuinnessNevada Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. MARTINEZ v. MARTINEZ (CHILD CUSTODY)Nevada Supreme Court · 2024
  2. Matkulak v. DavisNevada Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Miller v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Egosi Vs. Egosi (Child Custody)Nevada Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Garza-Wolski Vs. Wolski (Child Custody)Nevada Supreme Court · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API