Alicea v. Howell
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Pedro Alicea, appearing pro se, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”), alleges that his constitutional rights were violated in a number of respects in connection with a disciplinary proceeding against him in January and February 2003 at Orleans Correctional Facility (“Orleans”), after a urine sample provided by plaintiff tested positive for opiates. Defendants, all of whom at all relevant times were DOCS employees, have moved for…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mateo v. FischerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Roseboro v. GillespieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Bumpus v. CanfieldDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Barrington v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Crenshaw v. HerbertDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.