Legal Opinion

Crenshaw v. Herbert

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided August 21, 2006No. 03-CV-6385LPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, William Crenshaw, appearing pro se, commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”) alleges that defendants, all of whom were at all relevant times employed by DOCS at Attica Correctional Facility (“Attica”), have violated his constitutional rights in a number, of respects, primarily by retaliating against plaintiff for having engaged in activity protected by the First Amendment. Five of the six defendants have moved for summary…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Colon v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Davis v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roseboro v. GillespieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Taylor v. FischerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
  3. Medina v. SkowronDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011
  4. Ali Richard v. Martin, et al.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
  5. Gaston v. Lake CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API