Legal Opinion
Bumpus v. Canfield
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided July 20, 2007No. 6:05-mc-06001PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff James Bumpus, appearing pro se, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”), alleges that defendants, all of whom at all relevant times were officials or employees of DOCS, have violated his constitutional rights in connection with plaintiffs medical care and treatment while he was confined at the Elmira Correctional Facility (“Elmi-ra”) from 2004 to 2005. Defendants have moved for summary judgment.
Most of plaintiffs claims arise out of…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Burton v. LynchDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Jones v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Allah v. PooleDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Rosales v. KikendallDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Wright v. ConwayDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.