Legal Opinion

Jannette v. M. F. Patterson Dental Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 28, 1934No. 30,117PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from the order denying a new trial after verdict for defendants.

On January 19, 1933, about noon, plaintiff, a passenger on a street car crossing the Wabasha bridge in the city of St. Paul, signaled that she desired to get off at the northwesterly end of the bridge. After so doing, she walked to the rear platform of the car to be in readiness to step off when the rear doors opened. As the street car stopped or was in the act of stopping, defendant O’Dea, a city salesman of the other defendant, driving behind the street car in a Pontiac sedan, applied the brakes…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Ruddy v. IngebretSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Fox v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Zobel v. BoutelleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McKeown v. ArgetsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Ind v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Pigman v. NottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Raymond v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API