Zobel v. Boutelle
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Plaintiff recovered a verdict of $16,300 against appellant for injuries received in an automobile accident. Appellant’s motion for a neAV trial was granted unless plaintiff consented to a reduction of the verdict to $12,000. The consent was duly given, and so defendant’s motion, in effect resulted in a denial of a neAV trial, and he appeals.
A brief statement of the facts connected Avith plaintiff’s injuries should be made. On June 20, 1929, at about noon, plaintiff was riding in the rear seat of an automobile being driven by Mrs. Baker, one of the defendants, at a moderate speed north on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Merrill v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Anderson v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Dentinger v. UlebergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
3Cited by8 opinions
- Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Zickrick v. StrathernSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Alex v. JozelichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Seitzer v. HalversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Jannette v. M. F. Patterson Dental Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.