Legal Opinion

Raymond v. Kaiser

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 30, 1938No. 31,868PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

In this action to recover damages for personal injuries plaintiff sustained when a car owned and driven by defendant Kaiser collided with the car of plaintiff, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. Defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial being denied, they appeal.

The assignments of error present only the question of defendants’ right to judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and, if that be denied, their right to a new trial on ground of misconduct of plaintiff’s counsel.

The facts that gave rise to the action are in brief: At about three…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Jannette v. M. F. Patterson Dental Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Ernesto v. GutierrezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bass v. DehnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Olson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API