Legal Opinion

In re a Grand Jury Subpoena

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 22, 2006PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSosman, J.

In the present appeal, we are called on to decide whether the spousal privilege set forth in G. L. c. 233, § 20, Second, applies to a witness summonsed to appear before a grand jury. For the following reasons, we conclude that the privilege does not apply in grand jury proceedings.

1. Background. A Suffolk County grand jury was investigating a homicide that occurred on February 10, 2006. The prime suspect was arrested and ordered held without bail at his arraignment in the Boston Municipal Court Department. Thereafter, the defendant’s wife was summonsed to appear before *89the grand jury; she…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PaszkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  3. Commonwealth v. GalvinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. D'AmourMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. BoransMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KebreauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. RaposoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Green v. CosbyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. CottoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. HouricanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API