In re Grand Jury Investigation
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
In this case, we must decide whether a Superior Court judge properly denied motions to quash duces tecum summonses served on two minor children requiring them to testify against their father (father) before a grand jury. The judge stayed further grand jury proceedings to permit the children to seek relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, and to avoid a situation in which the children would refuse to testify, thereby making them subject to contempt proceedings. A single *21justice of this court concluded that review was appropriate, see Matter of a Grand Jury Subpoena, 430 Mass. 590, 592 n.5…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Blixt v. BlixtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Aime v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re a Grand Jury SubpoenaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Chadwick v. Duxbury Public SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- In re Grand Jury InvestigationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- COMMONWEALTH v. RAJIV R., a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025