Legal Opinion

In re Berger

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 9, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2013-002535; No. 27377PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINE IMPOSED

2Per curiam

Respondent is licensed to practice law in Florida;1 he is not licensed to practice law in South Carolina. In May 2013, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) filed Formal Charges against respondent alleging that, by use of the Internet, he solicited clients in South Carolina and represented clients in two separate legal matters before the courts of this state. Respondent did not answer the Formal Charges, was found to be in default, and is therefore deemed to have admitted the factual allegations made in those charges. See Rule 24(a), *315RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Following an…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. In Re HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. In re Van SonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. In Re DickeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. In re SamahaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Mark Andrew BruntySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  2. In the Matter of Nathan JardineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. In the Matter of Alma DefilloSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API