In re Berger
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINE IMPOSED
2Per curiam
Respondent is licensed to practice law in Florida;1 he is not licensed to practice law in South Carolina. In May 2013, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) filed Formal Charges against respondent alleging that, by use of the Internet, he solicited clients in South Carolina and represented clients in two separate legal matters before the courts of this state. Respondent did not answer the Formal Charges, was found to be in default, and is therefore deemed to have admitted the factual allegations made in those charges. See Rule 24(a), *315RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Following an…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- In Re HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- In re Van SonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- In Re DickeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- In re SamahaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
4Cited by3 opinions
- In the Matter of Mark Andrew BruntySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- In the Matter of Nathan JardineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- In the Matter of Alma DefilloSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014