Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Mark Andrew Brunty

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 25, 2015No. Appellate Case 2014-001840; 27503PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent failed to answer or appear in this attorney disciplinary matter and was held in default. 1 Following a hearing, the Panel recommended respondent be disbarred. We agree, disbar respondent, and order him to pay the costs of this disciplinary proceeding, 2 to make restitution to the clients identified in the attached appendix, to repay the Lawyers Fund for Client Protection for any payments made on respondent’s behalf, and to complete the Legal Ethics and Practice Program, Ethics School, Trust Account School, and Advertising School prior to seeking readmission to the South Carolina…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. In the Matter of Nathan JardineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. In re BergerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Steven Robert LaphamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  2. In re BaconSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  3. In re CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  4. In the Matter of Robert T. ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API