Legal Opinion

Succession of Le Blanc

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 11, 1917No. 22372PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Appeal from Seventeenth. Judicial District Court, Parish of Vermilion; William Pierrepont Edwards, Judge. In' the matter of the succession of Adonis Le Blanc. J. Earl Le Blanc and tutor of the minor children filed oppositions. Prom the judgment dismissing the opposition and the claim of certain creditors, the opponents and creditors appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.

Adonis Le Blanc took out three policies of insurance, for $2,000 each, known as 20-annual-payment' policies, on his life during his marriage with Rose Thibault Le Blanc. Two of the policies, in the Equi*29table Life Assurance Society, were made payable “to his wife, Hose Le Blanc, if living, if not then to the assured’s executors, administrators or assigns, subject to tbe right of tbe assured to change tbe beneficiary.” Tbe third policy, in tbe Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance Company of Philadelphia, was made payable “to bis wife, Hose Le Blanc, or, if tbe insured (should) survive tbe aforesaid…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holmes v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Succession of BuddigSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  3. Succession of VerneuilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  4. Flood v. LibbyWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Succession of RoderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. TL James & Co., Inc. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  2. Messersmith v. MessersmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  3. Lee v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. New York Life Insurance v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Thigpen v. ThigpenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API