Legal Opinion

Succession of Buddig

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1902No. 14,178PublishedCited by 37 opinions

APPEAL from the Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans— Theard, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Breaux, J.

Opponent claimed an amount collected on an insurance policy issued to the late Efenry Buddig constitutes a separate asset and does not fall into the community. Otto Knoop, under-tutor of Marie L. and Frederick M. Buddig, minor children of the late Henry Buddig, obtained an order of the District Court directing Mrs. Henry Buddig, natural tutrix of these minors, to hie a detailed and specific, account u£ her administration and to show cause why she should not invest the funds of the minors in bonds of the State in accordance with an order of…

2Cited by37 opinions

  1. TL James & Co., Inc. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  2. Messersmith v. MessersmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  3. Lee v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. New York Life Insurance v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Thigpen v. ThigpenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API