First Bank v. Brumitt
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boyd
“As a general rule, parties in Texas may contract as they wish,” Phila. Indemn. Ins. Co. v. White, 490 S.W.3d 468, 475 (Tex. 2016), and only “the parties to an agreement determine its terms,” Royston, Rayzor, Vickery, & Williams, LLP v. Lopez, 467 S.W.3d 494, 503-04 (Tex. 2015). In this case, a plaintiff who was not a party to a written contract claims that the contract permits him to enforce the agreement as a third-party beneficiary. We hold that the contract is unambiguous and does not make the plaintiff a third-party beneficiary. We also hold that the trial court erred by submitting that…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Texas Utilities Electric Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by152 opinions
- Uri, Inc. v. Kleberg Cnty.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
- Pathfinder Oil & Gas, Inc. and Cathlind Energy, Llc v. Great Western Drilling, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2019
- Jody James Farms, Jv v. the Altman Group, Inc. and Laurie DiazTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Michael Wease v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C., etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- dallas/fort Worth International Airport Board v. Vizant Technologies, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2019
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.