Legal Opinion

Janet v. Scarpetti

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 18, 1989No. 6496PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This action arose out of a contract by which the defendant agreed to purchase certain real estate from the plaintiff. The trial court found that the defendant had breached the contract and, by mandatory injunction, ordered him to terminate an encumbrance on the plaintiff’s title by removing the sales agreement from the Bethany land records.

We have carefully considered each of the defendant’s claims of error including a plenary review of the record, transcript and briefs of both parties. The defendant, as the appellant, has the burden of showing that there was error in the judgment from which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Manzin v. United Bank & Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Statewide Grievance Committee v. PresnickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  2. Fonsworth v. SudolConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. State v. FranklinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. Messenger v. MessengerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API