Legal Opinion

Messenger v. Messenger

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 1, 1989No. 7204PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We have carefully considered each of the defendant’s claims of error including a plenary review of the record, transcript and briefs of the parties. As the appellant, the defendant has the burden of showing that there was error in the judgment from which the appeal was taken. Janet v. Scarpetti, 17 Conn. App. 825, 552 A.2d 1225 (1989); Manzin v. United Bank & Trust Co., 6 Conn. App. 513, 517, 506 A.2d 169 (1986); B. Holden & J. Daly, Connecticut Evidence § 60. After affording the claims of error the appropriate, scope of review, we conclude that the defendant has not met her burden.

There is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manzin v. United Bank & Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  2. Janet v. ScarpettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Citytrust v. PageConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  2. Strother v. StrotherConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API