Legal Opinion
State v. Franklin
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 26, 1989No. 7054PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The defendant appeals from the trial court’s granting of the state’s petition to continue his commitment to the custody of the commissioner of mental health. He claims that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to act on the petition and, in the alternative, that the ruling was erroneous. He also challenges the original proceeding in which he was found not guilty by reason of insanity.
The relevant facts are set forth in Franklin v. Berger, 211 Conn. 591, 560 A.2d 444 (1989).
“On January 5,1978, a criminal court adjudged the petitioner not guilty by reason of insanity. Pursuant to General…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Rosenblit v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Franklin v. BergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Barra v. Ridgefield Card & Gift Gallery, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. PutnokiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Geren v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- In re Valerie D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Antonio A. v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021