Legal Opinion

Fonsworth v. Sudol

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 15, 1989No. 7176PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant Charles Mitchell in a negligence action arising out of a motor vehicle collision. The jury could reasonably have found that the plaintiff Frank E. Fonsworth, Jr.,1 was a passenger in a van operated by the defendant Charles Mitchell (hereinafter the defendant)2 when it was hit from the rear by a vehicle operated by the named defendant, Steven B. Sudol, on Main Street in Hartford. Immediately before the collision, both vehicles had been stopped at a traffic light. When the light turned green, the vehicles proceeded through…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wright v. BlakesleeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. State v. PhillipsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. Janet v. ScarpettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ParsonsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  2. State v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. State v. HydockConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. Fonsworth v. SudolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API