Legal Opinion

State v. Hylton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 2009No. 04C51746; A136240PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

This case is before us for the second time. In our previous decision, we concluded that the trial court had erred in failing to merge two of defendant’s convictions; we remanded for merger and for resentencing. State v. Hylton, 210 Or App 104, 150 P3d 47 (2006), rev den, 342 Or 473 (2007). In his appeal after remand, defendant contends that the trial court erred in imposing his new sentences. We affirm.

Defendant was indicted and tried on one count of attempted murder, ORS 161.405, ORS 163.115; two counts of kidnapping in the first degree, ORS 163.235; and one count each of assault in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Farmer v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. RickardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. HyltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ZolotoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. HOLLINGQUESTCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. FrinellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API