Legal Opinion

Walton v. Hill

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 1, 2009No. CV 05-1125-ACPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

MOSMAN, District Judge.

On May 12, 2009, Magistrate Judge Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (“F & R”) (# 71) in the above-captioned case recommending that petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (# 49) be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, Judge Acosta recommends that the Petition be GRANTED as to petitioner’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to communicate entry of final amended judgment within the time required to appeal such judgment. He further recommends that a conditional writ of habeas corpus be granted ordering…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walton v. MyrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Owens v. GittereDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
  3. Zaki Malik Saleem v. Lisa StensethDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API