Legal Opinion

Heirshberg v. Slater

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 23, 1992No. 73060PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Justice.

Four issues are presented by the petition for certiorari: 1) whether, pursuant to 12 O.S.1981 § 655,1 notice must be given by the service and return of summons on the party; 2) whether, under Rule 1.11, 12 *271O.S.Supp.1986, Ch. 15, App. 2,2 an appellant may affect a timely appeal by filing a petition in error within thirty days after the trial court resolves a reserved attorney fee issue; 3) whether petitions for new trial filed pursuant to 12 O.S.1981 § 655 need be accompanied by an affidavit or contain specific allegations of due diligence; and 4) whether, pursuant to 12…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Snyder v. Smith Welding & FabricationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Dodson Williams v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. McDonald's v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Wade v. HopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Tulsa County Budget Board v. Tulsa County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. Keel v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. TREAT v. STITTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
  5. BULARD AIR SERVICES v. BROWN AVIATIONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API