Legal Opinion
Keel v. Wright
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 7, 1995No. 81619PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
Keel brought an action in the District Court, alleging breach of contract. He dismissed as to two Defendants, but then obtained a default judgment against the remaining Defendant, Larry Wright. Wright appealed.1 Keel moved to dismiss the appeal. We effectively grant the motion in part, and will consider only that part of the appeal which was timely brought, taking no cognizance of that part which reached this Court too late.
Defendant Wright represented himself in the trial court and filed an answer to the petition. When he failed to appear at the pre-trial conference default…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McCullough v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Manning v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Mansell v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Grant Square Bank & Trust Co. v. WernerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Berry & Berry Acquisitions, LLC v. BFN Props. LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- BERRY AND BERRY ACQUISITIONS v. BFN PROPERTIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- State v. One Thousand Two Hundred Sixty-Seven DollarsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Bank IV Oklahoma, N.A. v. Southwestern Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Beavers v. ByersCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.