Legal Opinion

Elliot v. Lombard

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 9, 1934No. 463PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Devanter

Respondent Lombard, owner of motor ship “ Lucky Girl ” and a sand barge, presented to the District Court, Canal Zone, a libel in rem against the “ Real ” and in personam against her owner, Elliot, to recover damages resulting from a collision between those vessels — July, 1930. The “ Real ” was seized under admiralty process; her owner claimed and secured her release under a stipulation, whereon the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company was surety, which contained the following clause.

“ Now, therefore, the condition of this stipulation is such that if the stipulators undersigned, shall at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Vincent v. PleckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. State of Texas v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  3. Pflueger v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Pflueger v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. Oakland County v. HazlettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API