Legal Opinion
Oakland County v. Hazlett
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 14, 1937No. 7293PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
In an action at law against the appellant and the Royal Oak Drain District in Oakland County, Mich., by the holder of drain bonds of the same issue as those adjudged valid in the case of Royal Oak Drain District et al. v. Keefe et al. (C.C. A.) 87 F.(2d) 786, No. 7280, this day decided, a judgment was entered below for the plaintiff.
The appeal presents substantially the same issues with respect to the legality of the project under Michigan law for the completion of which the bonds were issued, the validity of the bonds, and the liability of Oakland County for their…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Masterson v. HerndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Schlosser v. HemphillSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Estis v. TrabueSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- H. E. Wolfe Const. Co. v. FersnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Louisa v. LeviCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Preston v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- Hudson v. Pacific Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Zentgrebe v. SchramCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939