Legal Opinion
Pflueger v. Sherman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 14, 1935No. 7321PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Three actions were filed by stockholders of H. Flackfeld & Co., Limited, in relation to the alleged sale of that corporation’s assets, to American Factors, Limited:
1. Isenberg v. Sherman, in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, Cal.; judgment against the complaining stockholders, who were also the complainants below and are the appellants herein, affirmed by the Supreme Court of California, 212 Cal. 454, 298 P. 1004; petition for rehearing denied, with opinion, 212 Cal. 507, 508, 299 P. 528; motion to recall re-mittitur denied, with opinion, 214…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Masterson v. HerndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Hardee v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Tefft v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Estis v. TrabueSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wire Tie MacH. Co. v. Pacific Box CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Pflueger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Hirschfeld v. McKinleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Tighe v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Hudson v. Pacific Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937