Childers v. Frye
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.
There are only two exceptions in the record. The first is to the ruling of the trial judge sustaining the motion for nonsuit, and the other is entirely formal. Therefore, the question of law to which all others are subsidiary is whether there was sufficient evidence to be submitted to the jury tending to establish the relationship of physician and patient between the deceased and the defendant. The duties which a physician owes to his patient have been established by several decisions, notably Long v. Austin, 153 N. C., 508; Mullinax v. Hord, 174 N. C., 607; Brewer v. Ring, 177 N. C., 476;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Brewer v. RingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Smith v. . WhartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Long v. . AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Mullinax v. . HordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Iodice v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Mozingo v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Lyons v. GretherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- Willoughby v. KENNETH W. WILKINS, MD, PACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Pendergraft v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.