Smith v. . Wharton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOB, J.
Applying the well settled rule uniformly enforced in this jurisdiction with respect to the-consideration of the evidence on a motion for judgment as of nonsuit, made as provided by C. S., 567 (Goss v. Williams, 196 N. C., 213, 145 S. E., 169, Nash v. Royster, 189 N. C., 408, 127 S. E., 356, Oil Co. v. Hunt, 187 N. C., 157, 121 S. E., 184, Christman v. Hilliard, 167 N. C., 4, 82 S. E., 949), to tbe evidence in tbe instant ease, we are of tbe opinion tbat there was no error in the judgment dismissing this action at tbe close of tbe evidence for tbe plaintiff. Considering tbe evidence in tbe…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
- Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Byrd v. Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Christman v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- State v. . SigmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Govin v. HunterWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
- Watson v. CluttsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Jackson v. Mountain Sanitarium & Asheville Agr. Sch.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Pendergraft v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.