Legal Opinion

Trerotola v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 1942No. Appeals, 249 and 250PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey, *

This is an appeal on the part of (1) the Philadelphia Gas Works Company from the refusal of the court below to grant it a new trial in a suit brought by Carmino Trerotola, individually and as guardian of Rocco Trerotola against the City of Philadelphia and The Philadelphia Gas Company, jointly for physical injuries and property damage suffered by the first named plaintiff and for physical injuries suffered by the last named plaintiff as a result of an explosion of illuminating gas in Greenwich Street, Philadelphia, on February 11, 1941.

Prior to the trial it was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Bailey v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Brown v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Ruhl v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Kline v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Jones Et Vir v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. PULLER (Et Al.) v. PullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Commonwealth v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Frank v. W. S. Losier Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API