Rauer v. Lowe
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
This action was brought by Rauer to recover an assessment for work performed in the construction of a sewer, and certain street work connected therewith, under a contract with the superintendent of streets, in the city and county of San Francisco. Written findings were filed and judgment entered for the plaintiff, and the appeal is from said judgment and an order denying defendant's motion for a new trial.
*231The plaintiff called as a witness John Gr. Fitzgerald, who testified that he was a deputy superintendent of streets. The witness then produced several certificates, purporting to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. JenksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Fletcher v. PratherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Libbey v. ElsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- White v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Byrne v. Luning Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gray v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Palmer v. BurnhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Williams v. BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Thomason v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Shaw v. FeehanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.