Legal Opinion

Kelly v. McDonald

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 1929No. Docket No. 3711PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, terminating a lease of real property, but refusing to allow liquidated damages for failure on the part of the defendants to commence the sinking of an oil-well within a specified time. The appeal is from the judgment-roll alone. The evidence is not before this court.

May 24, 1926, the plaintiffs leased to the defendants 320 acres of land for the purpose of sinking oil-wells thereon. The lease contained a provision to the effect that if the lessees, failed to “begin actual operations toward the drilling of a well on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dyer Bros. I. Wks. v. Central I. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Green v. FrahmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Long Beach City School District v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Dyer Bros. Golden W. Iron Works v. Cent. Iron WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rafael Chodos, an Individual v. West Publishing Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Doing Business in California Dba Bancroft-Whitney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Webster v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. McCarthy v. TallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Rice v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Six Companies of California v. Joint Highway Dist. No. 13Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API