Hill's, Inc. v. William B. Kessler, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*43Mallery, J.
The plaintiff, Hill’s, Inc., ordered thirty-four men’s suits from the defendant, using a printed form supplied by defendant through its salesman. The printed form provided that the order would not become a binding contract until it had been accepted by an authorized officer of the defendant at its office in Hammonton, New Jersey.
The defendant’s salesman procured the order on May 16, 1950, and on May 23, 1950, the defendant, by form letter, advised the plaintiff that “You may be assured of our very best attention to this order.” What occurred next is shown by the trial court’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bluegrass Cordage Co. v. Luthy & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
- Kelley, Maus & Co. v. La Crosse Carriage Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Bauman v. McManusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Northwest Auto Co. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
- Elder v. Florsheim Shoe CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nelson Equipment Co. v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Donald W. Lyle, Inc. v. Heidner & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Hill's, Inc. v. William B. Kessler, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1952