Legal Opinion

Nelson Equipment Co. v. Goodman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1953No. 32163PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This case brings into sharp focus the parol evidence rule and the doctrine of conditional delivery of written contracts.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing its action for the purchase price under a conditional sales contract, and a promissory note executed as a down payment.

March 1, 1951, defendant signed a written instrument ordering a “Hough H. M. Payloader” from plaintiff. The order contains the written notation “Subject switch HMD first available” (which refers to a change from gas to diesel power), and the printed statement:

“It is understood that the contract embodies the entire…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bond v. WiegardtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Walker v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Reiner v. CrawfordWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. McGregor v. First Farmers-Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Pitcher v. Lone Pine-Surprise Consolidated Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. North American Uranium, Inc. v. JohnstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  2. International Harvester Co. v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. Fleming v. AugustWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Meyer v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. J & J Construction Co. v. MayernikOregon Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API