Legal Opinion

Hill's, Inc. v. William B. Kessler, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1952No. 32074Published

1Opinion of the Court

41 Wn.2d 42 (1952)

246 P.2d 1099

HILL'S, INC., Respondent,

v.

WILLIAM B. KESSLER, INC., Appellant.[1]

No. 32074.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

August 7, 1952.

Alexander Wiley, for appellant.

Hall, Cole & Lawrence and Stanley F. Atwood, for respondent.

MALLERY, J.

The plaintiff, Hill's, Inc., ordered thirty-four men's suits from the defendant, using a printed form supplied by defendant through its salesman. The printed form provided that the order would not become a binding contract until it had been accepted by an authorized officer of the defendant at its office in Hammonton, New…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bluegrass Cordage Co. v. Luthy & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  2. Kelley, Maus & Co. v. La Crosse Carriage Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Bauman v. McManusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Northwest Auto Co. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
  5. Elder v. Florsheim Shoe CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API