Paxson v. Margulis-Stulman Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
Prom the record herein it appears that the defendant Margulis-Stulman Company, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as the defendant), was the owner of a certain lot which was valued by it at the sum of $7,950, and that plaintiff was the owner of two other lots on which she placed a value of $2,000. At the instance of the defendant, a written agreement was entered into between the parties by which, at the price of $7,950, the defendant agreed to sell to plaintiff, and plaintiff agreed to buy from the defendant, the lot owned by the defendant, and that in partial payment of said purchase…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Paolini v. SulprizioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- McGibbon v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Orton v. PrivettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carruth v. FritchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Carter v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Carruth v. FritchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950