Legal Opinion

Paxson v. Margulis-Stulman Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1932No. Docket No. 7476PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Prom the record herein it appears that the defendant Margulis-Stulman Company, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as the defendant), was the owner of a certain lot which was valued by it at the sum of $7,950, and that plaintiff was the owner of two other lots on which she placed a value of $2,000. At the instance of the defendant, a written agreement was entered into between the parties by which, at the price of $7,950, the defendant agreed to sell to plaintiff, and plaintiff agreed to buy from the defendant, the lot owned by the defendant, and that in partial payment of said purchase…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Paolini v. SulprizioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. McGibbon v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Orton v. PrivettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carruth v. FritchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Carter v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Carruth v. FritchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API