Legal Opinion

Orton v. Privett

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1927No. Docket No. L.A. 8581PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

Defendants have appealed from a judgment against them for seven thousand two hundred dollars. The action was brought to recover the amount of money paid by plaintiff under an agreement whereby the defendants were to transfer to him the exclusive sales right, in certain territory, of a patented compression inner tube for automobile tires, and to furnish him, at an agreed price, twelve inner tubes a day, to be manufactured and delivered either from a factory to be completed at Burbank, California, “or from some other factory.” The complaint, after alleging the facts with reference to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Field v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Russ Lumber & Mill Co. v. Muscupiabe Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  4. MacOwsky v. IrvineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Cherry v. HaydenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Abney v. Belmont Country Club Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Holt v. RavaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Paxson v. Margulis-Stulman Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API