Legal Opinion
Flowers v. Carville
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided November 24, 2003No. CVS991629PMPLRLPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PRO, Chief Judge.
For the third time since this action was commenced on November 18, 1999, the Court is called upon to address a series of dispositive motions filed on behalf of De fendants Hillary Rodham Clinton, James Carville and George Stephanopoulos.
Currently before the Court are Defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Clinton’s Motion”) (Doc. # 147), filed on August 18, 2003; Defendant James Carville’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Conspiracy Claim (“Carville’s Motion”) (Doc. # 157), filed on September 9, 2003; and the Join-der of Defendant George…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Flowers v. CarvilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Anthony Lawson v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- Carpenter v. Southern Nevada Regional Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
- Clarke v. City of North Las VegasDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
- Clarke v. City of North Las VegasDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.