Legal Opinion

Clarke v. City of North Las Vegas

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided August 27, 2024No. 2:24-cv-01046Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Karyl Clarke, Case No. 2:24-cv-01046-GMN-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 City of North Las Vegas, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 Under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has requested 12 authority to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 6). Plaintiff also submitted a complaint. (ECF 13 No. 1-2). Because the Court finds that Plaintiff’s application is complete, it grants the application 14 to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court also screens Plaintiff’s complaint. Because Plaintiff 15 does not allege a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API