Legal Opinion

Flowers v. Carville

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 9, 2006No. 04-15679; D.C. No. CV-99-1629-PMPPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM***

Gennifer Flowers appeals from orders granting summary judgment motions filed by Hillary Rodham Clinton, James Car-ville and George Stephanopoulos.

Clinton initially contends that we lack jurisdiction over Flowers’s appeal from the order filed November 24, 2003, because Flowers did not file a timely notice of appeal. Because the district court ordered entry of judgment in favor of Clinton, Flowers v. Carville, 292 F.Supp.2d 1225, 1234 (D.Nev.2003), and did not set forth judgment in a separate document, Flowers had 180 days from entry of the order to file the notice of appeal. See…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gennifer Flowers v. James Carville Hillary Rodham Clinton Little, Brown & Co. George StephanopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Siragusa v. BrownNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Flowers v. CarvilleDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sykes v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department of Clark County NevadaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
  2. Sykes v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department of Clark County NevadaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
  3. Watson v. City of HendersonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API