Legal Opinion

Clarke v. City of North Las Vegas

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided November 12, 2024No. 2:24-cv-01046Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Karyl Clarke, Case No. 2:24-cv-01046-GMN-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 City of North Las Vegas, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Karyl Clarke’s amended complaint. (ECF No. 9). 12 Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, so the Court screens his 13 amended complaint. The Court allows certain of Plaintiff’s claims to proceed and dismisses 14 others without prejudice and with leave to amend. The Court also provides instructions and 15 orders regarding executing service. 16 I.…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API