Legal Opinion
Arthur v. Armco, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 7, 2000No. 2:99CV133PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SARGUS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the defendants’ partial motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). (Doc. # 5). For the reasons that follow, the defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I
Plaintiff, who is African-American, alleges that he was discriminated against on the basis of race, that he was harassed and, that he was retaliated against during his employment with defendant Armco, Inc. Plaintiff commenced employment at Armco, Inc. in 1991. Plaintiff alleges that, beginning in 1992, he “discovered racist…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Richard G. Lawler v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt. Dunn, Captain McAlister Lieutenant Dunn, Officer Boehm, Officer Paul AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wiles v. Medina Auto PartsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Wiles v. Medina Auto PartsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Chenoweth v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Cavin v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Jakischa v. Central Parcel ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.