Legal Opinion
Jakischa v. Central Parcel Express
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 1, 2004No. 03-3976PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Michael T. Jakischa (“Jakischa”) appeals the final judgment dismissing, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, his action for retaliatory termination of employment under Ohio law. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of this action.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Defendant-Appellee, Central Parcel Express, Inc. (“CPE”), is a provider of shipping services. Jakischa was an at-will employee at CPE’s Cleveland distribution center. In November 2000, Jakischa injured his foot and ankle while employed by CPE. In November 2001,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rmi Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Michael T. Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 268Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Collins v. RizkanaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Saavedra v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Hall v. ITT AUTOMOTIVEDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
- Collins v. United States Playing Card Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- Dollar v. Smithway Motor Xpress, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2011
- Klopfenstein v. Nk Parts Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.