Glendale Fruit Co. v. Hirst
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. Webster Street, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
The appellee, C. T. Hirst, brought suit in the court below against the appellant, the Glendale Fruit Company, a corporation, to recover the sum of $1,661.14, upon three several causes of action, on the fourth day of January, 1898, the first of which charged the defendant company with an indebtedness of $375, due for salary as manager and superintendent of the defendant company’s fruit ranch, situate in the county of Maricopá, at the agreed and stipulated sum of $125 per month for the months of October, November, and December of the year 1897. The second cause of action charged an indebtedness…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stewart v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Searle v. PrestonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1851
- Syracuse City Bank v. CovilleNew York Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by4 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. HeggelundSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Weed v. Idaho Copper Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Randolph v. Koury Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Bayham v. Maryland National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966