Legal Opinion
Union Trust Co. v. Heggelund
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 23, 1991No. 14235PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The dispositive issue in this case is whether, under General Statutes § 52-380a(b),1 the *622entire amount of a judgment lien relates back to the date of a prior attachment, or whether the relation back is limited to the amount of the attachment. After a decree of foreclosure by sale to enforce a judgment lien held by the plaintiff, Union Trust Company (Union Trust), against the named defendant, Joseph Heggelund, Union Trust filed a motion for supplemental judgment asserting its rights to the entire balance of the funds generated by the sale. The defendant Linwood R. Clark, Jr. (Clark), another…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Turner v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Sassone v. LeporeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Thomason v. Chemical BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Hall v. Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Sullivan AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.