Legal Opinion
Barb-Lee Mobile Frame Co. v. Hoot
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 5, 1965No. Appeal, 309PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Musmanno,
On September 1, 1959, Charles T. Hoot and Meyer Cohen, president of the Barb-Lee Mobile Frame Co., entered into a contract whereby Hoot agreed to work for Barb-Lee on a percentage basis, with the proviso that if he discontinued his employment he would not, for five years, compete with Barb-Lee in Pennsylvania, Delaware and New Jersey. Barb-Lee is engaged in the business of straightening and realigning damaged automobile frames by means of a portable machine which is taken to the very site of the disabled car, and, by the application of heat and pressure,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Smith's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Co. v. JutteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
3Cited by62 opinions
- John G. Bryant Co. v. Sling Testing & Repair, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Jacobson & Co. v. International Environment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Maryann Spinetti v. Service Corporation International and Service Corporation International of Pennsylvania D/B/A Lafayette Memorial ParkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Albee Homes, Inc. v. Caddie Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Piercing Pagoda, Inc. v. HoffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.