Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Rodgers v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1992No. 64577PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matia, Chief Justice.

On October 28, 1992, relator Otis L. Rodgers, Sr. commenced this action against the respondent Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas to compel the court to rule upon his motion for return of property and declaratory judgment which he filed on September 8,1992. In support of his mandamus Rodgers relies upon R.C. 2701.02 and Knox v. Knox (1986), 26 Ohio App.3d 17, 26 OBR 186, 498 N.E.2d 236. Sua sponte, for the following reasons this court dismisses the above-captioned action.

First, the authorities which Rodgers cites are not controlling. R.C. 2701.02 does provide that when…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State ex rel. Ney v. NiehausOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Butler v. DemisOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Aluminum Industries, Inc. v. EganOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Ticknor v. RandallOhio Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Guardianship of MaurerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Duncan v. DeWeeseOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Thompson v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. McElhaney v. Marc Glassman, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. D'ApolitoOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API