Legal Opinion

Aluminum Industries, Inc. v. Egan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1938No. 5491PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By ROSS, PJ.

Motion has heen made to dismiss the appeal for failure, to comply with the rule of the court providing the time for filing briefs.

In view of the real question presented by the' appellant, we consider that the motion should be overruled.

The case proceeded to trial upon the cross-petition of the defendant, who sought damages from the plaintiff based upon a breach of a contract of employment. The defendant testified in his own behalf. The plaintiff on cross-examination, inquired of the defendant what employment he had sought or found after leaving the plaintiff. Defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heath v. WatersMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Rutherford v. . HolmesNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Cumberland Railroad v. GirdnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Gallagher v. GallagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Howard v. Chamberlin, Boynton & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Klingbeil v. TruesdellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. State Ex Rel. Rodgers v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Rutger v. WalkenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Louisville N. R. Co. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  5. Kominar v. Health Management Associates of West Virginia, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API