State Ex Rel. Ticknor v. Randall
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Section 12285, General Code, reads: “The writ [of mandamus] may require an inferior tribunal to exercise its judgment, or proceed to the discharge of any of its functions, but it cannot control judicial discretion.”
The Court of Common Pleas exercised its judgment, first, in overruling the motion to set the will contest for hearing only upon the issue of the interest of the contestant, and, second, in overruling the contestant’s motion to dismiss the defendants’ motion for an order of abatement and dismissal, and continuing the latter motion for determination when the will-contest…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Dunphy v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- State Ex Rel. McCamey v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Cook v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Schucker v. MetcalfOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Rodgers v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Dayton Women's Health Center, Inc. v. EnixOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Jenkins v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.